QUOTE(Scorpio @ Apr 5 2009, 05:04 PM)

QUOTE(aboutblank1976 @ Apr 5 2009, 12:45 PM)

Is this any different to say buying an Action Man or toy soldiers? The imitation of life potential is not just tied to religious use though. How many kids have used the same figures to simulate war or aggression (I loved playing war as a kid) with their parents knowledge? In essence I agree it's wrong, it is somehow soiling childhood as a time of innocence and play by adapting toys for almost ideological gain.
Another childs toy controversy (although not religion related)
Kid won't give a t*ss whether they are accurate or not.
If it's got a trigger and a barrel, it's a gun as far as a child is concerned.
At the end of the day a child's mind is an endless expanse of imagination. You give him an object without restrictions and he'll play with it how he fancies.
It's like the difference between a theme park and a playground. In a playground you have access to different kinds of toys and rides, and you are allowed to use your own imagination to figure out how to create games you enjoy. In a theme park all the rides have been created for you and are either good or bad by design. The playground clearly offers more freedom but it requires you to think and be an active participant, while the theme park has taken those responsibilities away from you and you can just go with the flow.
Thats what people aren't seeing. The action man or whatever they are calling it now is a playground, not a theme park. Just because it comes wearing camo and holding a gun, doesn't mean it's going to be played with as such.