QUOTE(Rach227 @ Oct 29 2008, 11:50 PM)

To be fair he was meant to be there for an interview, the guy didnt show up they filled there time slot.
Fair?

its not like he said he'd turn up but didnt. He told them he couldnt be there in advance. And even if he did just not turn up, that doesnt mean he could expect that sort of abuse down the phone and for the recordings to go out on air when he didnt want them to
It was agreed by Sachs and the producer that those recordings wouldnt go on air, but they did
QUOTE(oolongcha @ Oct 30 2008, 10:01 AM)

The person I think who should lose his job is the person who ok'd that part of the show for broadcast, because clearly went too far and someone should have realised that.
Yes i agree
QUOTE(oolongcha @ Oct 30 2008, 10:01 AM)

You couldn't be more right -
this shows that for six days
after the show went out, there were
two complaints about language at the time. It wasn't until a Daily Mail article almost a week later that complaints started to pour in - eg Tuesday it was 10,000; a day later, 27,000 (!!).
Good old Daily Mail

I cant believe there has been so many complaints. Its ridiculous.